Chapter IV: Not His Mother’s Son

Chapter IV: Not His Mother’s Son
In November 2008 I had strong doubts that Stanley Ann Dunham was the pretender’s mother. The Kenyan birth myth was falling apart. As Pamela Gellar pointed out, the logistics of a Kenyan birth did not wash. Also, Stanley Ann was not on the island when the pretender was born there. The Kenyan birth certificates were far less credible than Dr. Fukino’s interviews and her press release of 27 July 2009 (see the Alabama Supreme Court brief herein). The purported Kenyan certificates were likely explained by the submission of a forged Kenyan certificate in Stanley Ann’s ex parte divorce from Obama the Luo tribesman. Deliberate concealment and destruction of mitochondrial DNA raised a strong negative inference that analysis of it would conclusively disprove the fictional notion that Stanley Ann was the pretender’s actual birth mother. All children of a mother have identical mitochondrial DNA, regardless of gender or who the father was. Genetic analyses of the hair of Maya Soetoro-Ng, the daughter of Stanley Ann by Lolo Soetoro, and the pretender prove beyond reasonable scientific doubt that it is biologically impossible that the pretender is a son of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro.
It should be noted that Stanley Ann died from ovarian cancer. While not conclusive, this is some evidence that she did not bear a child before age 20, contrary to the Dreams from My Father hoax.
Moreover, Stanley Ann’s second husband, Lolo Soetoro, was a prominent Islamic fundamentalist figure from the world’s largest Muslim country. Such a man is very unlikely to marry a woman who is not a virgin.
Remember also the savvy American immigration officer who threatened a paternity test and thereby caused the Luo tribesman to back off his request for resident alien status and settle for a temporary student visa.
And if Stanley Armour Dunham was the pretender’s birth father, the overwhelming probability is that the pretender’s birth mother was a woman of color. Stanley Ann Dunham was not a person of color. Conversely, disproof of Stanley Ann as the birth mother strongly suggests that the birth father could be a pale item such as Stanley Armour Dunham. The acid tests are Hawai’i’s vital records and the pretender’s DNA, which prove conclusively that neither the Luo tribesman nor Stanley Ann Dunham was a birth parent of the pretender, contrary to the fraudulent Dreams from My Father.
There are those who fancy that Stanley Ann was the pretender’s birth mother by Frank Marshall Davis as birth father. This hypothesis hangs on gossamer threads such as a family resemblance between Davis and the pretender, and Davis’s vainglorious boasting that he had seduced a young white girl. As I’ve suggested, however, it appears that Stanley Ann was virgin until her marriage to Lolo Soetoro, long after the pretender’s birth. I suspect that the family resemblance could come from a family connection many years ago, when (my speculation) the Dunhams migrated from New England to Kansas to help keep it a free state and give succour to refugee slaves. An honest, objective and adept genealogist should look into the Dunham and Davis genealogies to see whether such a connection can be made. This would seem to rule out the genealogists of the New England Historic Genealogical Society, which lost all credibility by refusing to get definitive evidence of the pretender’s true birth parents before rushing to print a false family tree based on a stupid, negligent and unquestioning acceptance of the fictitious Dreams from My Father. A host, or more appropriately a herd, of authors and observers fell in line. I dropped the Phi Beta Kappa Association in disgust when it betrayed the liberal arts tradition in publishing an article about the pretender based on the author’s unquestioning acceptance of the hoax.
It is unnecessary to debate these points, however, when cheap and simple genetic analyses of the mitochondrial DNA of Maya Soetoro-Ng and the pretender prove beyond reasonable scientific doubt that it is biologically impossible that the pretender is the child of Stanley Ann Dunham.
When I challenged the New York Times on the pretender’s true identity and racial heritage, my letters were not published. Other publications and book authors also ignored me. To Jack Cashill, brilliant investigative reporter, the really important, important question was who wrote Dreams from My Father, not its verisimilitude. I raised the question with a brilliant law professor at the Harvard Law School, from which I took a degree decades before the pretender:
Dershowitz to Newsmax: Obama Could Be ‘Chamberlain of 21st Century’
Tuesday, 28 Feb 2012 12:25 PM
By Martin Gould and Ashley Martella
President Barack Obama is in danger of going down in history as “the
Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century,” if he fails to stop Iran’s
development of the nuclear bomb, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz
tells Newsmax.TV.
“I know Obama, I like Obama, I voted for Obama,” Dershowitz said in
the exclusive interview. “I hope he is not remembered in history as
the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century, the person who didn‘t see
the greatest evil, didn’t recognize the greatest evil of the 20th
century, as Chamberlain did not.”
© Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Barry We Barely Knew Ye
Albert Moore
Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:51 AM
Dear Professor Dershowitz,
How well do you know Barack Hussein Obama II, really?
Chamberlain, at least, was a patriot, not an enemy agent or, as you suggest, completely blind to the German threat. (He did fail to act earlier, when he should have.)
So you “know” and “like” and “voted for” Obama, per the article . . .from “Newsmax”. Were you accurately quoted?
Have you seen Obama’s original birth certificate, showing his actual birth parents?
Have you seen an analysis of Obama’s DNA, showing it’s biologically impossible for him to be the son of a Negro father and a Caucasian mother? This disproves his official autobiography “Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance” and the partial picture of his amended birth certificate he trotted out as [another] original birth certificate on 27 April 2011.
Would you like him and vote for him if you knew him better, and saw evidence that he had no Negro parent, probably lost his U.S. citizenship from foreign naturalization, and has been a Comintern mole for all or most of his adult life?
If you bear true faith and allegiance to the United States, and if you are a friend of Israel, why don’t you join the call for an exhaustive congressional investigation of Obama, to verify his constitutional eligibility at birth (as the evidence will show), ascertain his racial
identity (which he fraudulently misrepresents), elicit facts bearing upon the effect of his Indonesian naturalization on his U.S. citizenship (he fraudulently denies Indonesian citizenship and conspires with the Indonesian President to conceal evidence of it), and determine to the extent possible his actual allegiance (probably to the Comintern). Perhaps, if you “know” Obama better you will “like” him less and will be pleased to acquaint state secretaries of state with the facts and law regarding the possible loss of his U.S. citizenship so that they may make fully informed and rational decisions whether to bar him from their respective ballots. “Natural born citizen” subsumes “citizen”.
Obama can’t be a natural born U.S. citizen if he is no longer a U.S. citizen at all, even though he was a natural born U.S. citizen on the day of his birth. Obama was constitutionally eligible on the day of his birth as the son of two U.S. citizen parents, born in Hawai’i on 4 August 1961, as his original birth certificate, confirmed by DNA analysis, will show. Dr. Fukino’s press release of 27 July 2009, finding Obama to be a natural-born American citizen, was based on information in the original birth certificate, still not released by Obama. Dr. Fukino’s
finding excludes the black Luo as a birth father, because he was an alien. Hence the long form birth certificate showing Obama the black Luo as Obama’s birth father must be the amended birth certificate, required by Hawai’i in adoptions. Obama on 27 April 2011 trotted out a
partial picture of the amended birth certificate, effectively an adoption certificate, on the false pretense that it was the original.
Comparison of Obama’s Y-DNA with that of close male relatives of Barack Hussein Obama the alien Luo shows with reasonable scientific certainty that the Luo could not be Obama’s birth father.
Original evidence is required, which in turn requires official subpoenae, starting with subpoenae of Obama’s vital records – both the original and the amended long form birth certificates – and his DNA to exclude the remote possibility of a ringer. Analysis of Obama’s DNA will also show that it’s biologically impossible for him to be the son of a Negro father and a Caucasian mother, disproving both the 27 April 2011 “birth certificate” and the official autobiography.
The real issue of Obama’s eligibility is his probable loss of U.S. citizenship altogether by his naturalization as an Indonesian citizen. Foreign naturalization, like conviction for treason, is a potentially expatriating act.
Although Obama was a child when naturalized, his actions as an adult probably confirmed and ratified his juvenile acts, and set the seal on his foreign naturalization to make it voluntary and with the intent to relinquish his U.S. citizenship, many years before he ran for an
office that required U.S. citizenship. Exquisitely detailed official investigation of Obama is required to confirm Obama’s eligibility at birth and resolve the issue of whether he lost U.S. citizenship. This will also elicit evidence that Obama conspired with the Indonesian President to destroy or conceal evidence of Obama’s Indonesian citizenship, and that Obama has been a Comintern mole for all or most of his adult life. His birth father and adoptive parents were communists, he was raised as a communist, and events of the anti-communist insurgency in mid-1960s Indonesia, in which Stanley Ann Dunham and Lolo Soetoro were involved, probably sealed his youthful animosity toward the United States.
Will you join the gallery of the invincibly ignorant and “know” without facts and “like” a subversive fiend and vote for Obama forever? Must allowance ever be made for your attending The Other Law School?
Sincerely, Albert W, L, Moore, Jr., 63L (The 45th class reunion’s
report of my demise was greatly exaggerated.)
Dershowitz never replied. If he read the message, which is doubtful, he did not understand it or, more likely, refused to believe it or that it made any difference. But if the racial hoax got the pretender nominated and elected non-president in the face of constitutional ineligibility and it leads to genocide of the American people and a dark age for the world for which no end is in sight, then it is surely of epic significance in the history of modern man.
This is not a matter of personal pique or a penchant for controversy. It is further evidence that smart and accomplished people are wanting in critical thinking about the pretender. They are as susceptible as the masses to psychological manipulation, the herd mentality, wishful thinking and extraordinary delusions. Perhaps more so. This massive mental and psychological lapse will almost certainly culminate in the greatest genocide in history, the death in the course of a year of 90% of the American populace, about 250,000 in the first hour as disabled aircraft fall from the skies. And, because people lack critical thinking skills, they will believe that the disaster was the result of a natural solar event. They are already being psychologically prepared and conditioned to such a belief.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *